On 5/30/13 12:37 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote: > So sounds like File[] defeats the whole purpose of what I'm > suggesting, which is to avoid introducing new types and instead use > plain JS-Arrays. For the readonly case plain JS arrays might work, if your freeze them, etc. This is already expressible in WebIDL, kinda: you say you return "object" and define in prose what the object is. > This is an interesting question. I actually do like having > myInputElement.files.push(5) throwing, but that would preclude using a > real JS Array? I think it would, yes... -BorisReceived on Thursday, 30 May 2013 04:50:29 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:13 UTC