Le 14/05/2013 15:03, Boris Zbarsky a écrit : > On 5/14/13 9:04 AM, David Bruant wrote: >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-script-coord/2013AprJun/0167.html >> > > I should note that the description of the browser event loop in that > message is wrong. It does not have only two FIFO queues in the specs, > or in implementations. In particular, see task sources. I will. This part is quite dense and complicated but important especially with the upcoming ES7 work on the event loop to make sure it is sufficiently low-level to implement (in spec and/or code) the browser event loop model. > I would be strongly opposed to specifying something that requires only > two FIFO queues. I have to admit that the idea of forging in ES7 the "2 nested event loops" model seems that it may rule out valuable use cases. I would be in favor of some spec freedom here in the message ordering/reordering policy. Let's see where this go. Thanks for your message, DavidReceived on Tuesday, 14 May 2013 14:15:04 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:13 UTC