Re: Reconciling handling of optional arguments and handling of default values across ES and webidl

On 9 May 2013 03:18, Boris Zbarsky <> wrote:
> I guess let's take this requirement for ES as a sunk compatibility cost.
> Where do we go with WebIDL?

Maybe I misunderstand, but is there any reason why WebIDL needs to
care about the arguments object at all?

FWIW, I agree with your proposal about defaults.


Received on Thursday, 9 May 2013 12:15:43 UTC