W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-script-coord@w3.org > April to June 2013

Why is [Constructor] not allowed on partial interfaces?

From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
Date: Mon, 06 May 2013 10:44:27 -0400
Message-ID: <5187C1CB.2050606@mit.edu>
To: "public-script-coord@w3.org" <public-script-coord@w3.org>

Is there a reason [Constructor] is not allowed on partial interfaces? 
Seems like adding a new constructor signature in a partial interface 
ought to be ok...

-Boris

Received on Monday, 6 May 2013 14:44:57 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Jonas Sicking: "Re: Promises: Auto-assimilating thenables returned by .then() callbacks: yay/nay?"
Previous message: Markus Lanthaler: "RE: API updated to use Futures - request for review"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:13 UTC