> The specification does need to address that better, in particular what > then() and catch() might return for subclassed futures. We found use > cases both for returning a new instance of the subclassed future > itself (ProgressFuture) and simply returning a new "base" future (for > the crypto APIs). > I think this difficulty points to a deeper issue with attempting to make a promise something other than a placeholder for a value. Namely: it's no longer obvious how the information or abilities stored in the promise itself should propagate through the graph. The featureless-ness of promises is one of their most important features. { Kevin }Received on Wednesday, 1 May 2013 13:39:47 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:13 UTC