Re: Futures

2013/4/26 Kevin Smith <>

>  Oops yeah. I guess that should be fixed. :/
>> Fixing that would break compatibility with Promises/A+. To remain
>> compatible with A+ and unwrap only one layer, the spec would need a way to
>> discern promises from thenables.
> I don't think so.  It has no bearing on Promises/A+, because A+ doesn't
> test the case where the promise's value is itself a promise.

Yes, sorry. It will on version 1.1:


Received on Friday, 26 April 2013 19:28:22 UTC