2013/4/26 Kevin Smith <zenparsing@gmail.com> > > Oops yeah. I guess that should be fixed. :/ >>> >> >> Fixing that would break compatibility with Promises/A+. To remain >> compatible with A+ and unwrap only one layer, the spec would need a way to >> discern promises from thenables. >> > > I don't think so. It has no bearing on Promises/A+, because A+ doesn't > test the case where the promise's value is itself a promise. > Yes, sorry. It will on version 1.1: https://github.com/promises-aplus/promises-spec/#the-promise-resolution-procedure Juan
Received on Friday, 26 April 2013 19:28:22 UTC