- From: Till Schneidereit <tschneidereit@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 15:44:07 +0100
- To: "Mark S. Miller" <erights@google.com>
- Cc: es-discuss <es-discuss@mozilla.org>, "public-script-coord@w3.org" <public-script-coord@w3.org>, TC39 <e-TC39@ecma-international.org>
- Message-ID: <CAD0sBY4O498dkrWd3K_FOJJs_bqKY4i3kvKvLf7vO99kuXu2bQ@mail.gmail.com>
Is there any chance at all of macros รก la sweet.js will be on the agenda for ES7 (or 8)? I would very much like for that to happen to enable even more, and more light-weight, experimentation with and cow-path building for the syntactic language surface. On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 5:21 AM, Mark S. Miller <erights@google.com> wrote: > (Thanks to Rick Waldron and Brendan Eich for encouragement towards posting > this) > > As we see on es-discuss, the pressure towards standardizing soon various > features currently absent from ES6 is increasing. Rather than stretch ES6, > I think we should work towards completing ES6 asap, and then proceed to > ship an ES7 that is both more modest and out earlier than current > expectations. I think the focus of ES7 should be parallelism, concurrency, > asynchrony, and preparation for distribution. Call this the "concurrency > theme". This involves at least > > * Communicating Event Loop concurrency model, > - with the two-priority event loop already required by both browser > and server. > * Object.observe > * Distribution compatible promises (at least Promises/A+) > * Module Loaders > * Weak References > > I hesitate to put Module Loaders on the above list rather than leaving > them in ES6; but it would allow their semantics to rest on event loops and > their API to rest on promises. If we can get ES7 out quickly, this need not > be as painful as it might seem, and would help us ship ES6 faster. > > > Elements of the concurrency theme that may be in ES7 or may be postponed > to ES8: > > * RiverTrail > * The Vat model > * The semantics of inter-vat communications > - including a principled alternative of structured clone > - The emphasis being remote object messages, with postMessage > and such being only one of many transports. > * The promise hooks needed to extend promises securely over the network > - See makeFar and makeRemote at > > https://code.google.com/p/es-lab/source/browse/trunk/src/ses/makeQ.js#410 > * Event streams > > How much of the latter we bite off in ES7 and how much we delay till ES8 > will determine how quickly we can ship ES7. But however they split between > ES7 and ES8, I think these should be the next things on our plate after ES6. > > > Some things that I think should clearly wait till ES8: > > * SES > * Distributed persistence > * The actual distributed cryptographic protocol for doing distributed > secure persistent object communications. > > Some of these should perhaps be on separate tracks within TC39, much as > i18n is already on a separate track. > > > Some non-concurrency issues that will nevertheless be pressing in the ES7 > timeframe: > > * Completing the class design > - at least high integrity and private state > * Quasi-parsers for JS, HTML, CSS > * Pinning down the full semantics of inter-realm interaction within a > Vat, e.g., > - multiple same-domain iframes > - loader-created fresh frames > * Possibly lexically nested modules > > Although I'm posting this on three lists, discussion should proceed only > on es-discuss. > > Thoughts? > > -- > Cheers, > --MarkM > > _______________________________________________ > es-discuss mailing list > es-discuss@mozilla.org > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss > >
Received on Wednesday, 24 April 2013 14:44:35 UTC