On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 1:37 PM, David Bruant <bruant.d@gmail.com> wrote: > I personally wonder whether the compatibility with existing libraries is so > important. It should be pretty easy to wrap a native future into a library > future (aren't native futures already Promise/A+ compatible?) and vice > versa. Why isn't it enough to help with compatibility with libraries? They are compatible because of how futures make use of then. -- http://annevankesteren.nl/Received on Monday, 22 April 2013 13:13:25 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:12 UTC