Re: Futures

>
> In particular, I'd love to get TC39 to look over the "is-a-future"
> issue. I'm pretty worried about the current solution which makes
> "then" a magic property name. It's less bad than "__proto__" is, but
> not by a lot.
>

I agree - I'm putting together a list of a few issues with Futures that I
would like to see addressed, and this is one.

{ Kevin }