W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-script-coord@w3.org > April to June 2013

Re: Futures (was: Request for JSON-LD API review)

From: Jorge <jorge@jorgechamorro.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2013 15:00:48 +0200
Message-Id: <6D7A76F3-6490-4A7D-89B1-C686AEBC0762@jorgechamorro.com>
To: EcmaScript <es-discuss@mozilla.org>, public-script-coord@w3.org
On 17/04/2013, at 17:46, Anne van Kesteren wrote:

>> If it was up to me JavaScript would just be part of the W3C
> and we would not have to deal with that layer of distraction.

On 17/04/2013, at 19:48, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:

> I strongly support any efforts to move JS standardization into the
> umbrella of the W3C.

The very thought of it sends chills down my spine.

The w3c has demonstrated blindness and incompetence. Remember how and why the whatwg came to be? Stop pretending. You guys ought to be deeply embarrassed because HTML5 is *not* your child.

Who wants a JS infested of inconvenient APIs w3c-style?
( Jorge )();
Received on Thursday, 18 April 2013 13:01:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:12 UTC