- From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2013 21:38:48 -0400
- To: "public-script-coord@w3.org" <public-script-coord@w3.org>
This has come up a few times now. Right now in WebIDL an attribute has a single type associated with it: the setter coerces the given value to that type if it can, and the getter returns that type. It's not a priori obvious that this is a great fit for all APIs, especially because of the restrictions in WebIDL on attribute types not being sequences or dictionaries ... which are there just because _returning_ those from an attribute would not be good. So a question in terms of API design: from the point of view of JS API consumers, does it make sense to have an attribute whose setter, say, takes an array of File or Blob objects, or a single File or Blob object, but whose getter always returns some object (always the same one) that represents the current set of File/Blob objects we've got? That sort of thing is not possible to declare in WebIDL right now. Should it be? There's relevant discussion in https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=757664 and https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=20407 for those who are interested. -Boris
Received on Thursday, 18 April 2013 01:39:19 UTC