- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2013 10:49:37 -0700
- To: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>
- Cc: "public-script-coord@w3.org" <public-script-coord@w3.org>
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 10:33 AM, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu> wrote: > On 4/17/13 11:45 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: >> because a separate "Futures" spec will be exactly as >> standards-track-advanced as the current DOM spec. > > But might be able to move forward faster.... Given that Futures aren't in any W3C spec in the first place (they exist only in a WHATWG spec), the concept of "advancement" doesn't seem relevant. ~TJ
Received on Wednesday, 17 April 2013 17:50:23 UTC