W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-script-coord@w3.org > April to June 2013

[Bug 21640] Dictionaries and callbacks should be distinguishable

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2013 14:40:49 +0000
To: public-script-coord@w3.org
Message-ID: <bug-21640-3890-3QSKikZUVX@http.www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/>

--- Comment #9 from Markus Lanthaler <mark_lanthaler@gmx.net> ---
> It sounds like in this instance "Node" style and "Web" style
> don't agree...  It's not clear to me why we're using the former
> for a web spec (or using webidl for a non-web spec, if this
> is not a web spec), honestly.

Hmm... would you mind sending this comment directly to
public-rdf-comments@w3.org so that it can be formally addressed? Thanks.

Why is object or object[] not valid WebIDL? The only restriction on arrays I've
found in the WebIDL spec is the following: "The element type of an array MUST
NOT be a sequence or dictionary type." Is it because object and object[] are
not distinguishable? What could we do about that?

You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Friday, 12 April 2013 14:40:53 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:12 UTC