- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2013 14:40:49 +0000
- To: public-script-coord@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=21640 --- Comment #9 from Markus Lanthaler <mark_lanthaler@gmx.net> --- > It sounds like in this instance "Node" style and "Web" style > don't agree... It's not clear to me why we're using the former > for a web spec (or using webidl for a non-web spec, if this > is not a web spec), honestly. Hmm... would you mind sending this comment directly to public-rdf-comments@w3.org so that it can be formally addressed? Thanks. Why is object or object[] not valid WebIDL? The only restriction on arrays I've found in the WebIDL spec is the following: "The element type of an array MUST NOT be a sequence or dictionary type." Is it because object and object[] are not distinguishable? What could we do about that? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Friday, 12 April 2013 14:40:53 UTC