- From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 13:15:50 -0400
- To: Adam Barth <w3c@adambarth.com>
- CC: whatwg <whatwg@lists.whatwg.org>, "public-script-coord@w3.org" <public-script-coord@w3.org>
On 9/25/12 12:54 PM, Adam Barth wrote: > I'm not sure what needs to be done in spec-land to make valueOf work > correctly, but in implementation-land it needs the same unforgability > mitigations as toString. Well, one thing that needs to happen is that its behavior needs to be specced. Should it do the same thing as the canonical Object.prototype.valueOf does? -Boris
Received on Tuesday, 25 September 2012 17:16:23 UTC