public-script-coord@w3.org from July to September 2012 by date

Saturday, 29 September 2012

• Re: In WebIDL, should having a .prototype on interface objects be optional? Rick Waldron
• RE: In WebIDL, should having a .prototype on interface objects be optional? Travis Leithead

Friday, 28 September 2012

• Re: In WebIDL, should having a .prototype on interface objects be optional? Rick Waldron
• Re: In WebIDL, should having a .prototype on interface objects be optional? Cameron McCormack
• RE: In WebIDL, should having a .prototype on interface objects be optional? Travis Leithead
• Re: In WebIDL, should having a .prototype on interface objects be optional? Boris Zbarsky
• RE: In WebIDL, should having a .prototype on interface objects be optional? Travis Leithead
• Re: In WebIDL, should having a .prototype on interface objects be optional? Boris Zbarsky
• Re: In WebIDL, should having a .prototype on interface objects be optional? Cameron McCormack
• [Bug 19101] New: consider allowing nested enum definitions bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

Wednesday, 26 September 2012

• Re: Spec for location object needs to make some properties unforgeable; need supporting WebIDL changes Cameron McCormack
• Re: Spec for location object needs to make some properties unforgeable; need supporting WebIDL changes Boris Zbarsky
• Re: [whatwg] Spec for location object needs to make some properties unforgeable; need supporting WebIDL changes Adam Barth

Tuesday, 25 September 2012

• Re: Spec for location object needs to make some properties unforgeable; need supporting WebIDL changes Cameron McCormack
• Re: [whatwg] Spec for location object needs to make some properties unforgeable; need supporting WebIDL changes Adam Barth
• Re: [whatwg] Spec for location object needs to make some properties unforgeable; need supporting WebIDL changes Boris Zbarsky
• Re: [whatwg] Spec for location object needs to make some properties unforgeable; need supporting WebIDL changes Adam Barth
• Re: [whatwg] Spec for location object needs to make some properties unforgeable; need supporting WebIDL changes Boris Zbarsky
• Re: [whatwg] Spec for location object needs to make some properties unforgeable; need supporting WebIDL changes Adam Barth
• Spec for location object needs to make some properties unforgeable; need supporting WebIDL changes Boris Zbarsky

Monday, 24 September 2012

• RE: In WebIDL, should having a .prototype on interface objects be optional? Travis Leithead

Friday, 21 September 2012

• What should happen when [Unforgeable] is used on a consequential interface of an ancestor? Boris Zbarsky
• Re: In WebIDL, should having a .prototype on interface objects be optional? Boris Zbarsky
• RE: In WebIDL, should having a .prototype on interface objects be optional? Travis Leithead
• In WebIDL, should having a .prototype on interface objects be optional? Boris Zbarsky

Tuesday, 18 September 2012

• [Bug 18909] "File a bug" link bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 18909] New: "File a bug" link bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 18908] New: Consider disallowing expandos on objects with a named getter but no named setter bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

Friday, 14 September 2012

• [Bug 18878] New: [[NativeBrand]] of "Function" doesn't seem to exist in current ES6 drafts bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 16075] Make a float/double type that excludes NaN/Infinity/-Infinity bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

Thursday, 13 September 2012

• Re: Web IDL attributes and delegation Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Web IDL attributes and delegation Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Web IDL attributes and delegation Colin Snover

Wednesday, 12 September 2012

• Re: Web IDL attributes and delegation Boris Zbarsky
• RE: Web IDL attributes and delegation Travis Leithead
• Web IDL attributes and delegation Colin Snover
• [Bug 18846] New: Editorial - 4.2.20 Should 'D' be 'dictionary'? bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

Tuesday, 11 September 2012

• [Bug 17713] Exceptions thrown from event handlers should not be propagated bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

Friday, 7 September 2012

• [Bug 17508] Let enum lists end with a comma bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

Wednesday, 5 September 2012

• New ECMAScript Internationalization API draft posted to wiki Norbert Lindenberg

Friday, 31 August 2012

• Re: Extended attributes on WebIDL typedefs need to be defined better, or just dropped Glenn Adams
• Extended attributes on WebIDL typedefs need to be defined better, or just dropped Boris Zbarsky

Thursday, 23 August 2012

• Off-by-one error in double to long long conversion ? João Eiras

Friday, 17 August 2012

• RE: "var" declarations shadowing properties from Window.prototype Travis Leithead
• Re: "var" declarations shadowing properties from Window.prototype Boris Zbarsky
• Re: "var" declarations shadowing properties from Window.prototype Brendan Eich
• Re: "var" declarations shadowing properties from Window.prototype Thaddee Tyl

Thursday, 16 August 2012

• RE: "var" declarations shadowing properties from Window.prototype Travis Leithead
• Re: "var" declarations shadowing properties from Window.prototype Brendan Eich
• Re: "var" declarations shadowing properties from Window.prototype Brendan Eich
• Re: "var" declarations shadowing properties from Window.prototype Boris Zbarsky
• RE: "var" declarations shadowing properties from Window.prototype Travis Leithead
• Re: "var" declarations shadowing properties from Window.prototype Boris Zbarsky
• Re: "var" declarations shadowing properties from Window.prototype Boris Zbarsky

Wednesday, 15 August 2012

• Re: "var" declarations shadowing properties from Window.prototype Brendan Eich
• RE: "var" declarations shadowing properties from Window.prototype Travis Leithead
• Re: "var" declarations shadowing properties from Window.prototype Brendan Eich
• RE: "var" declarations shadowing properties from Window.prototype Travis Leithead
• RE: "var" declarations shadowing properties from Window.prototype Travis Leithead
• RE: "var" declarations shadowing properties from Window.prototype Travis Leithead
• Re: "var" declarations shadowing properties from Window.prototype Boris Zbarsky
• Re: "var" declarations shadowing properties from Window.prototype Axel Rauschmayer
• Re: Unrestricted dictionary Boris Zbarsky
• Unrestricted dictionary Brian Birtles

Tuesday, 14 August 2012

• New ECMAScript Internationalization API draft posted to wiki Norbert Lindenberg

Monday, 13 August 2012

• Re: "var" declarations shadowing properties from Window.prototype Cameron McCormack
• Re: "var" declarations shadowing properties from Window.prototype Brendan Eich

Sunday, 12 August 2012

• Re: "var" declarations shadowing properties from Window.prototype Boris Zbarsky
• Re: "var" declarations shadowing properties from Window.prototype Boris Zbarsky
• Re: "var" declarations shadowing properties from Window.prototype Brendan Eich
• Re: "var" declarations shadowing properties from Window.prototype Brendan Eich
• Re: "var" declarations shadowing properties from Window.prototype Boris Zbarsky
• Re: "var" declarations shadowing properties from Window.prototype Sigbjorn Finne
• Re: "var" declarations shadowing properties from Window.prototype Boris Zbarsky
• Re: "var" declarations shadowing properties from Window.prototype Brendan Eich
• Re: "var" declarations shadowing properties from Window.prototype Boris Zbarsky
• Re: "var" declarations shadowing properties from Window.prototype Boris Zbarsky
• Re: "var" declarations shadowing properties from Window.prototype Brendan Eich
• Re: "var" declarations shadowing properties from Window.prototype Brandon Benvie
• Re: "var" declarations shadowing properties from Window.prototype Brandon Benvie
• Re: "var" declarations shadowing properties from Window.prototype Brendan Eich
• Re: "var" declarations shadowing properties from Window.prototype Brendan Eich
• Re: "var" declarations shadowing properties from Window.prototype Brendan Eich
• Re: "var" declarations shadowing properties from Window.prototype Boris Zbarsky
• Re: "var" declarations shadowing properties from Window.prototype Boris Zbarsky
• Re: "var" declarations shadowing properties from Window.prototype Brendan Eich
• Re: "var" declarations shadowing properties from Window.prototype Brendan Eich
• Re: "var" declarations shadowing properties from Window.prototype Sigbjorn Finne
• Re: "var" declarations shadowing properties from Window.prototype Boris Zbarsky
• Re: "var" declarations shadowing properties from Window.prototype Boris Zbarsky
• Re: "var" declarations shadowing properties from Window.prototype Boris Zbarsky
• Re: "var" declarations shadowing properties from Window.prototype Boris Zbarsky
• Re: "var" declarations shadowing properties from Window.prototype Boris Zbarsky
• Re: "var" declarations shadowing properties from Window.prototype Boris Zbarsky
• Re: "var" declarations shadowing properties from Window.prototype Boris Zbarsky
• Re: "var" declarations shadowing properties from Window.prototype Boris Zbarsky
• Re: "var" declarations shadowing properties from Window.prototype Brandon Benvie
• RE: "var" declarations shadowing properties from Window.prototype Domenic Denicola
• Re: "var" declarations shadowing properties from Window.prototype Jonas Sicking
• Re: "var" declarations shadowing properties from Window.prototype Cameron McCormack
• Re: "var" declarations shadowing properties from Window.prototype Brendan Eich
• Re: "var" declarations shadowing properties from Window.prototype Brendan Eich
• Re: "var" declarations shadowing properties from Window.prototype Brendan Eich
• Re: "var" declarations shadowing properties from Window.prototype Brendan Eich
• Re: "var" declarations shadowing properties from Window.prototype Allen Wirfs-Brock
• Re: "var" declarations shadowing properties from Window.prototype Cameron McCormack
• Re: "var" declarations shadowing properties from Window.prototype Kyle Huey
• Re: "var" declarations shadowing properties from Window.prototype Allen Wirfs-Brock
• Re: "var" declarations shadowing properties from Window.prototype Cameron McCormack
• Re: "var" declarations shadowing properties from Window.prototype Allen Wirfs-Brock
• Re: "var" declarations shadowing properties from Window.prototype Brendan Eich
• Re: "var" declarations shadowing properties from Window.prototype Cameron McCormack
• Re: "var" declarations shadowing properties from Window.prototype Cameron McCormack

Saturday, 11 August 2012

• Re: "var" declarations shadowing properties from Window.prototype Brendan Eich
• Re: "var" declarations shadowing properties from Window.prototype Allen Wirfs-Brock
• Re: "var" declarations shadowing properties from Window.prototype Allen Wirfs-Brock
• Re: "var" declarations shadowing properties from Window.prototype Jonas Sicking
• Re: "var" declarations shadowing properties from Window.prototype Brendan Eich
• Re: "var" declarations shadowing properties from Window.prototype Jonas Sicking
• Re: "var" declarations shadowing properties from Window.prototype Brendan Eich
• Re: "var" declarations shadowing properties from Window.prototype Brendan Eich
• Re: "var" declarations shadowing properties from Window.prototype Jonas Sicking
• Re: "var" declarations shadowing properties from Window.prototype Allen Wirfs-Brock

Friday, 10 August 2012

• Re: "var" declarations shadowing properties from Window.prototype Brendan Eich
• Re: "var" declarations shadowing properties from Window.prototype Rick Waldron
• Re: "var" declarations shadowing properties from Window.prototype Allen Wirfs-Brock
• Re: "var" declarations shadowing properties from Window.prototype Boris Zbarsky
• Re: "var" declarations shadowing properties from Window.prototype Brendan Eich
• Re: "var" declarations shadowing properties from Window.prototype Cameron McCormack
• Re: "var" declarations shadowing properties from Window.prototype Brendan Eich
• "var" declarations shadowing properties from Window.prototype Cameron McCormack

Sunday, 5 August 2012

• Re: [WebIDL] cycles in [PutForward] chains Cameron McCormack
• Re: [WebIDL] cycles in [PutForward] chains Glenn Adams
• Re: [WebIDL] cycles in [PutForward] chains Cameron McCormack

Saturday, 4 August 2012

• Re: [WebIDL] cycles in [PutForward] chains Glenn Adams
• Re: [WebIDL] cycles in [PutForward] chains Boris Zbarsky
• Re: [WebIDL] cycles in [PutForward] chains Tab Atkins Jr.
• [WebIDL] cycles in [PutForward] chains Glenn Adams

Wednesday, 1 August 2012

• Re: SVG 2 build scripts Cameron McCormack
• SVG 2 build scripts Cameron McCormack

Tuesday, 31 July 2012

• Issues with platform array objects in WebIDL Boris Zbarsky

Friday, 27 July 2012

• [Bug 18424] New: Cannot parse static operation with ReturnType (WebIDL editors draft 10 July 2012) bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 18421] New: Cycle language about dictionaries needs s/interface/dictionary/ bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 18420] New: Cycles via dictionary members should probably be prohibited bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

Tuesday, 24 July 2012

• Add undefined as a type to WebIDL Tab Atkins Jr.

Monday, 23 July 2012

• [Bug 18362] New: Make stringifiers not take into account expandos bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

Sunday, 22 July 2012

• [Bug 18352] New: Note about Object.prototype.toString is unclear bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

Wednesday, 18 July 2012

• [Bug 18023] New: Typo DOMString bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

Tuesday, 17 July 2012

• Re: Public review of ECMAScript Internationalization API Norbert Lindenberg

Wednesday, 11 July 2012

• [Bug 17749] New: [WebIDL] Nit: "unrestricted double type" defined as 32-bit bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

Tuesday, 10 July 2012

• [Bug 17722] All interface objects should have a 'length' property bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 17722] All interface objects should have a 'length' property bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 17722] All interface objects should have a 'length' property bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

Monday, 9 July 2012

• Re: Dictionary or interface? Anne van Kesteren
• Dictionary or interface? Jussi Kalliokoski
• [Bug 17722] All interface objects should have a 'length' property bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 17722] New: All interface objects should have a 'length' property bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

Sunday, 8 July 2012

• [Bug 17719] Consider throwing when attribute setter is called without an argument. bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 17719] New: Consider throwing when attribute getters are called without an argument. bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

Friday, 6 July 2012

• WebIDL should define "native Array" Boris Zbarsky

Thursday, 5 July 2012

• Re: RegExp support in WebIDL Garrett Smith

Wednesday, 4 July 2012

• Re: RegExp support in WebIDL Anne van Kesteren
• RegExp support in WebIDL Lachlan Hunt

Tuesday, 3 July 2012

• Public review of ECMAScript Internationalization API Norbert Lindenberg

Last message date: Saturday, 29 September 2012 14:59:37 UTC