Re: Should Exceptions be Errors in the ECMAScript bindings? from Erik Arvidsson on 2012-06-22 (public-script-coord@w3.org from April to June 2012)

From: Erik Arvidsson <arv@chromium.org>
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 09:50:31 -0700
To: Allen Wirfs-Brock <allen@wirfs-brock.com>
Cc: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>, Travis Leithead <Travis.Leithead@microsoft.com>, "public-script-coord@w3.org" <public-script-coord@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CAJ8+GohKY_m6wD8J7gEJEjM57Pd7S+uYEA1-i4_6TZQ4aaRcrw@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 8:51 AM, Allen Wirfs-Brock
<allen@wirfs-brock.com> wrote:
> Given this direction, it probably isn't a good idea for WebIDL to be trying to standardize [[Class]] values and their usage as type tags.

Allen, maybe I am missing something. How do we ensure compatibility
with the existing web with the ES6 Object.prototype.toString behavior?

-- 
erik

Received on Friday, 22 June 2012 16:51:20 UTC