W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-script-coord@w3.org > April to June 2012

Re: Detecting the "type" of a DOM object

From: David Bruant <bruant.d@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 14:55:44 +0200
Message-ID: <4FE319D0.8020908@gmail.com>
To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
CC: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>, public-script-coord@w3.org
Le 21/06/2012 12:36, Anne van Kesteren a écrit :
> On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 10:15 AM, David Bruant<bruant.d@gmail.com>  wrote:
>> I'm not a big fan of the idea of introducing new syntax specifically to fix
>> the DOM and with no other purpose.
> I do not understand the problem completely I think, but this seems
> more widely applicable than just the DOM. E.g. XMLHttpRequest,
> EventSource, Notification, ...
Indeed, sorry, I meant "browser APIs", but what I said remains. I'm not 
a big fan of introducing new syntax for the sake of repairing the 
browser built-in libraries.
If new syntax was introduced to fix browser APIs, would it be applicable 
for user-defined libraries as well?

Received on Thursday, 21 June 2012 12:56:19 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:06 UTC