- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 04:20:09 +0000
- To: public-script-coord@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=16832 --- Comment #2 from Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au> 2012-06-20 04:20:08 UTC --- OK, so two things to fix here: 1. We shouldn't look up a "length" property on a platform object that has indexed properties when we want to know how many there are, since that property from the prototype could be changed. Instead, we should just know internally how many indexed properties there are. 2. We should always expose a "length" property on objects that have indexed properties, and not have to define an IDL attribute for it. If we do this, then we should require indexed properties not to be sparse (which I think they currently can be). Boris mentioned that it might be better to have "length" exposed as a data property rather than an accessor property (and if we do that, then it'll need to be on the object itself rather than on the prototype). Is anyone opposed to doing that? -- Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 20 June 2012 04:20:12 UTC