- From: T.J. Crowder <tj@crowdersoftware.com>
- Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 22:00:39 +0100
- To: Allen Wirfs-Brock <allen@wirfs-brock.com>
- Cc: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>, public-script-coord@w3.org, Istvan Sebestyen <istvan@ecma-international.org>, es-discuss <es-discuss@mozilla.org>
- Message-ID: <CAH65x-zMXvhKMpQzdr+MxN=L-v_DVPCtw2rE68hqyB_=2SDPZQ@mail.gmail.com>
Hi, That's fanTAStic about finally having a normative, deeply-linkable, HTML edition of the spec. On 24 May 2012 19:13, Allen Wirfs-Brock <allen@wirfs-brock.com> wrote: > > On May 24, 2012, at 11:03 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > > > Yay HTML, welcome to the nineties! ;-) We usually need to link to the > latest version however, any chance of getting that? > > > http://www.ecma-international.org/publications/standards/Ecma-262.htm > > is a gateway page that will always contain links to both the HTML and PDF > version of the latest edition > Yes, but given the significant (and welcome) effort to keep section numbers the same version-on-version, rather than having all links to 5.1 rot (e.g., become out of date) as of 5.2, it would be very useful to have pseudo-targets that represent: * The latest 5.x * The latest, period So for instance: http://ecma-international.org/ecma-262/5.1/#sec-4.3.2 ...links to Section 4.3.2 of Edition 5.1, but http://ecma-international.org/ecma-262/5/#sec-4.3.2 ...links to Section 4.3.2 of whatever the latest 5.x is, and http://ecma-international.org/ecma-262/#sec-4.3.2 ...links to Section 4.3.2 of whatever the *current* standard is. Separately, ideally, with not just section names, but semantically-intelligent targets. For instance, while it would be nice if http://ecma-international.org/ecma-262/#sec-4.3.2 ...always linked to the current Section 4.3.2, even better would be if http://ecma-international.org/ecma-262/#primitive-value ...always linked to the description of "primitive value" (the current Section 4.3.2). This is entirely "doable." A concept is unlikely to go entirely away (although terminology changes), and if it does, a link to a brief description of the fact it went away (or changed) would be useful. If TC39 needs volunteers to come up with the set of semantically-intelligent targets, sign me up. Best, -- T.J. Crowder tj / crowder software / com www / crowder software / com
Received on Thursday, 24 May 2012 21:01:39 UTC