Hi,
That's fanTAStic about finally having a normative, deeply-linkable, HTML
edition of the spec.
On 24 May 2012 19:13, Allen Wirfs-Brock <allen@wirfs-brock.com> wrote:
>
> On May 24, 2012, at 11:03 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
>
>
> Yay HTML, welcome to the nineties! ;-) We usually need to link to the
> latest version however, any chance of getting that?
>
>
> http://www.ecma-international.org/publications/standards/Ecma-262.htm
>
> is a gateway page that will always contain links to both the HTML and PDF
> version of the latest edition
>
Yes, but given the significant (and welcome) effort to keep section numbers
the same version-on-version, rather than having all links to 5.1 rot (e.g.,
become out of date) as of 5.2, it would be very useful to have
pseudo-targets that represent:
* The latest 5.x
* The latest, period
So for instance:
http://ecma-international.org/ecma-262/5.1/#sec-4.3.2
...links to Section 4.3.2 of Edition 5.1, but
http://ecma-international.org/ecma-262/5/#sec-4.3.2
...links to Section 4.3.2 of whatever the latest 5.x is, and
http://ecma-international.org/ecma-262/#sec-4.3.2
...links to Section 4.3.2 of whatever the *current* standard is.
Separately, ideally, with not just section names, but
semantically-intelligent targets. For instance, while it would be nice if
http://ecma-international.org/ecma-262/#sec-4.3.2
...always linked to the current Section 4.3.2, even better would be if
http://ecma-international.org/ecma-262/#primitive-value
...always linked to the description of "primitive value" (the current
Section 4.3.2).
This is entirely "doable." A concept is unlikely to go entirely away
(although terminology changes), and if it does, a link to a brief
description of the fact it went away (or changed) would be useful.
If TC39 needs volunteers to come up with the set of
semantically-intelligent targets, sign me up.
Best,
--
T.J. Crowder
tj / crowder software / com
www / crowder software / com