- From: Travis Leithead <travis.leithead@microsoft.com>
- Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 19:09:48 +0000
- To: Erik Arvidsson <arv@chromium.org>, "public-script-coord@w3.org" <public-script-coord@w3.org>
>-----Original Message----- >From: arv@google.com [mailto:arv@google.com] On Behalf Of Erik Arvidsson > >I assume this has been covered before but I could not find any >previous discussion. > >Would it make sense to make DOM exceptions be Error objects in the >ECMAScript bindings? The reason this came up (again) is that some >engines provide stack traces on Error objects and developers also want >this on DOMExceptions. If DOMExceptions where real Errors engines >would get that feature for "free". I believe that WebIDL currently requires that DOM exceptions inherit from the ES "Error" prototype. This effectively makes them Errors for most purposes.
Received on Wednesday, 18 April 2012 19:10:28 UTC