Re: Arrays in WebIDL aren't making sense to me so far from Cameron McCormack on 2012-04-06 (public-script-coord@w3.org from April to June 2012)

From: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
Date: Fri, 06 Apr 2012 11:13:49 +1000
To: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
CC: "public-script-coord@w3.org" <public-script-coord@w3.org>
Message-ID: <4F7E434D.9020005@mcc.id.au>

Boris Zbarsky:
> That would make a lot more sense, yes.  You need an actual bug report,
> or is this thread, enough?

This thread is enough, should be fixed now.

> I think that works.  In practice, having different types for "array that
> you might have to hand back sometime" (which would require creation of
> an actual platform array object) and "array that you just need to hold
> on to" (which doesn't really) would be nice for my purposes, but I might
> be able to fake it with annotations in IDL.

I am reluctant introduce another array-ish type at this point!

Received on Friday, 6 April 2012 01:14:21 UTC