W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-script-coord@w3.org > April to June 2012

Re: Should binding section be rewritten more algorithmically?

From: Kyle Huey <me@kylehuey.com>
Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2012 14:12:44 -0700
Message-ID: <CAP045AoOU_yWdd6kh2m02cg+AzFxFHEq-e-oFd-KdXu9Xx65mA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Marcos Caceres <marcosscaceres@gmail.com>
Cc: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>, Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>, Travis Leithead <travis.leithead@microsoft.com>, public-script-coord <public-script-coord@w3.org>
Hi Marcos,

On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 5:27 AM, Marcos Caceres <marcosscaceres@gmail.com>wrote:

> Hi Kyle,
> On Saturday, 24 March 2012 at 19:05, Kyle Huey wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 6:10 PM, Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au(mailto:
> cam@mcc.id.au)> wrote:
> > > Marcos Caceres:
> >
> >
> > FWIW, I've found the grammar to be extremely useful for building the
> parser we're using for Gecko.
> Do you have a description of the parser (or a link to)? What is it used
> for?

The parser is located at
https://hg.mozilla.org/users/khuey_mozilla.com/webidl-parser/.  We're using
it in Gecko with a code generator that we've written to generate C++ glue
code for our new DOM bindings.  This is all very much a work in progress,
and the parser needs a fair amount of cleanup (the spec changed under me
multiple times as I was working on it, so I have some support for things
that are gone e.g. modules).

- Kyle
Received on Sunday, 1 April 2012 21:13:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:06 UTC