- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2011 10:18:14 +0100
- To: public-script-coord@w3.org
On Wed, 28 Dec 2011 07:21:35 +0100, Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au> wrote: > I don't think more specs should depend on the definition of Function > that's in HTML, since it's kind of non-specific and designed to work > with the weirdo timer APIs. We have callbacks in Web IDL now, and specs > that need them should define more specific signatures to use. You suggested using callback Function = any (any... arguments); in https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=14916 I was wondering if that includes [TreatNonCallableAsNull] and if not, how that needs to be included. That was part of the reason why it would be nice if Web IDL had the definition instead, so we could remove [TreatNonCallableAsNull] and just have 'function'. (I believe we discussed this already but I cannot find it in the archives. Sorry!) -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Wednesday, 28 December 2011 09:18:37 UTC