- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2011 12:54:45 +0100
- To: public-script-coord@w3.org
On Fri, 23 Dec 2011 06:32:49 +0100, Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au> wrote: > It's the process we use over in the SVG WG, as I understand that > Disposition of Comments documents produced for the transition from LCWD > to CR are more convincing when there are indications of whether > commentors were happy with the resolution of the issues they raised. > Probably this is more important for rejections, though, so perhaps it's > not strictly necessary here. Yeah, when there is disagreement it makes sense. But when everyone is agreed I think it increases the noise unnecessarily (and it's extra work). -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Friday, 23 December 2011 11:55:14 UTC