- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 19:26:21 +0000
- To: public-script-coord@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11451 --- Comment #17 from Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> 2011-12-14 19:26:21 UTC --- (In reply to comment #16) > I was only suggesting we throw for methods. We should not throw for attributes. > And I'm not sure what the best way to support enum is. It might be nicer if we > could just do: > > attribute "foo" "bar" "baz" someAttribute; > > Tab, example of such an API? The MutationObserver API, for instance, defines a MutationObserverOptions interface, which it uses to type the second argument to observe(). -- Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 14 December 2011 19:26:23 UTC