W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-script-coord@w3.org > October to December 2011

Re: Reviving E4X (H4E)?

From: Mark S. Miller <erights@google.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2011 15:54:24 -0800
Message-ID: <CABHxS9hHivMXGJfaf8kJ-5ScdFxHfg7SB=YQ9GH0+YW4pX9RTw@mail.gmail.com>
To: ☻Mike Samuel <msamuel@google.com>
Cc: Alex Russell <slightlyoff@google.com>, Dominic Cooney <dominicc@chromium.org>, Brendan Eich <brendan@mozilla.org>, Allen Wirfs-Brock <allen@wirfs-brock.com>, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>, "public-script-coord@w3.org" <public-script-coord@w3.org>, Rafael Weinstein <rafaelw@google.com>, Adam Klein <adamk@google.com>, Erik Aarvidson <arv@google.com>
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 7:43 AM, ☻Mike Samuel <msamuel@google.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 10:37, Alex Russell <slightlyoff@google.com>
> wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 5:22 AM, Dominic Cooney <dominicc@chromium.org>
> wrote:
> >> Quasis don’t provide a means for accurate error reporting, ie line and
> >> column numbers. (Since quasis seem designed for embedding DSLs, this
> seems
> >> like a shortcoming?)
> This is true right now, but if the quasi were changed to include the
> file, line number and char offset of the open quote and the number of
> lines and length of last line for each substitution, then position
> info is recoverable with the exception of tab columns introduced
> inside substitutions.

I like the idea of enhancing the quasis proposal so that source+line+column
can be recovered. However, I don't understand the tab column notion, and
(perhaps related?) I don't see how the needed extra info can be this simple.

If indeed we need more info, and if we had a standard composable source map
format as deeply freezable JSON data[1], then I would like to see such a
map included in the literal data object.

[1] Is any emerging as a de facto std?

Received on Tuesday, 22 November 2011 23:54:55 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:04 UTC