[Bug 14878] Rename const to legacyconst


--- Comment #12 from Yehuda Katz <wycats@gmail.com> 2011-11-22 06:27:43 UTC ---
Why are bitmasks superior to boolean properties?

(In reply to comment #11)
> (In reply to comment #10)
> > Bitmasks are not a good user-facing API for JavaScript. Anecdotally, SproutCore
> > 1.x used bitmasks for some state management code in our data store API, and it
> > was one of the most confusing (and "weird") parts of that API.
> Can you say more? What were people confused about? If it's the botched C
> operator precedence heritage, that's informative -- that poisons the whole
> well.
> > Is there anything lost by simply using String literals for this purpose? As a
> > practitioner, I agree with Anne that constant/bitmask APIs are more annoying to
> > use, and don't seem to offer any obvious gain other than the emotional appeal
> > of cargo-culting a C best practice.
> Use cargo culting properly. There are no fake airplanes here, flags and bitwise
> operators work. The question is about usability, not sentiment or
> pre-scientific pattern-matching.
> /be

Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

Received on Tuesday, 22 November 2011 06:29:09 UTC