- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2011 08:02:41 +0000
- To: public-script-coord@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=14877 --- Comment #5 from Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au> 2011-11-19 08:02:40 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > Of course, WebIDL already has [[Class]] and other requirements that are > impossible to conform to in ES5 implementations. Right, we've already crossed the bridge into ES5+proxies land. I am not strongly disposed in either direction, but if we do choose something related to the interface name, it should "<Interface>Prototype" makes sense to me. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Saturday, 19 November 2011 08:02:43 UTC