- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2011 08:49:12 -0700
- To: "Robin Berjon" <robin@berjon.com>
- Cc: public-script-coord@w3.org, "David Flanagan" <dflanagan@mozilla.com>
On Wed, 09 Nov 2011 09:32:57 -0700, Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com> wrote: > It's not 100% clear to me whether you wrote "Callback(Event)?" to mean > "CallbackEvent or just Callback" or as a nullable Callback parameterised > with Event. If the latter (which I think is the case), I believe that > David is suggesting Callback<Event> for consistency with sequence<Foo>. I meant that it would either take a callback or null and that the callback is passed an Event object as argument when invoked. -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Wednesday, 9 November 2011 16:50:14 UTC