public-script-coord@w3.org from October to December 2011 by date

Thursday, 29 December 2011

• [Bug 14913] No way to specify [OverrideBuiltins] if the getter is in a partial interface bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: TypeError and use of bold Marcos Caceres
• Re: done with Web IDL LC#2 comments Marcos Caceres
• Re: done with Web IDL LC#2 comments Cameron McCormack
• done with Web IDL LC#2 comments Cameron McCormack
• Re: TypeError and use of bold Cameron McCormack
• Re: [WebIDL] Dictionaries and undefined Cameron McCormack
• Re: no longer treating explicit undefined as a missing, optional argument Cameron McCormack
• [Bug 15355] variadic links to nowhere... bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 14913] No way to specify [OverrideBuiltins] if the getter is in a partial interface bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

Wednesday, 28 December 2011

• Re: Function type Cameron McCormack
• [Bug 14913] No way to specify [OverrideBuiltins] if the getter is in a partial interface bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 14916] WebIDL has no function type bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 15349] Object.prototype.toString override isn't actually defined bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 15348] "class name" is used once by mistake instead of "class string" bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 15355] New: variadic links to nowhere... bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: Function type Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Function type Cameron McCormack
• [Bug 14916] WebIDL has no function type bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: [WebIDL] Simplify callbacks Cameron McCormack

Tuesday, 27 December 2011

• [Bug 15349] Object.prototype.toString override isn't actually defined bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 15348] "class name" is used once by mistake instead of "class string" bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 14877] Define [[Class]] of interface prototype objects, exception interface objects, and exception interface prototype objects bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 15349] Object.prototype.toString override isn't actually defined bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 14877] Define [[Class]] of interface prototype objects, exception interface objects, and exception interface prototype objects bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 15349] New: Object.prototype.toString override isn't actually defined bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 14877] Define [[Class]] of interface prototype objects, exception interface objects, and exception interface prototype objects bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 15348] "class name" is used once by mistake instead of "class string" bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 15348] New: "class name" is used once by mistake instead of "class string" bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 14885] "4.9.1.1. Exception interface object [[Call]] method" does not match browsers bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 14813] Prototype of interface objects is Object.prototype in implementations, not Function.prototype bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 14746] Clarify what happens when you try using unsupported property indexes bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 14887] Prototype of exception interface objects is Object.prototype in implementations, not Error.prototype bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 14878] Rename const to legacyconst bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

Friday, 23 December 2011

• Re: [WebIDL] Make [AllowAny] the default? Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [WebIDL] Make [AllowAny] the default? Cameron McCormack
• no longer treating explicit undefined as a missing, optional argument Cameron McCormack

Thursday, 22 December 2011

• Re: Distinguishing objects and arrays? Anne van Kesteren
• [Bug 14188] Union types bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: [WebIDL] Make [AllowAny] the default? Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [WebIDL] Make [AllowAny] the default? Cameron McCormack
• Re: Distinguishing objects and arrays? Cameron McCormack
• [Bug 14188] Union types bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: new overloading model Cameron McCormack
• Re: new overloading model Cameron McCormack

Wednesday, 21 December 2011

• [Bug 11451] Add a string enum type bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: new overloading model Cameron McCormack
• Re: new overloading model Simon Pieters
• [Bug 11451] Add a string enum type bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 11451] Add a string enum type bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 11451] Add a string enum type bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 11451] Add a string enum type bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 11451] Add a string enum type bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 11451] Add a string enum type bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

Tuesday, 20 December 2011

• [Bug 11451] Add a string enum type bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 11451] Add a string enum type bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: new overloading model Cameron McCormack
• Re: new overloading model Anne van Kesteren
• Re: new overloading model Simon Pieters
• [Bug 14428] Investigate if onfoo properties should be handled in a special way in interface.prototype bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• new overloading model Cameron McCormack
• Re: Distinguishing objects and arrays? Cameron McCormack

Monday, 19 December 2011

• [Bug 14877] Define [[Class]] of interface prototype objects, exception interface objects, and exception interface prototype objects bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: [WebIDL] Dictionaries and undefined Cameron McCormack

Friday, 16 December 2011

• [Bug 14428] Investigate if onfoo properties should be handled in a special way in interface.prototype bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: [WebIDL] Simplify callbacks Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [WebIDL] Simplify callbacks Jonas Sicking
• [Bug 14877] Define [[Class]] of interface prototype objects, exception interface objects, and exception interface prototype objects bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: [WebIDL] Simplify callbacks Cameron McCormack

Thursday, 15 December 2011

• Re: [WebIDL] Simplify callbacks Ojan Vafai
• Re: [WebIDL] Simplify callbacks Ojan Vafai
• [Bug 14877] Define [[Class]] of interface prototype objects, exception interface objects, and exception interface prototype objects bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 14877] Define [[Class]] of interface prototype objects, exception interface objects, and exception interface prototype objects bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: [WebIDL] Simplify callbacks Jonas Sicking
• Re: [WebIDL] Simplify callbacks Ian Hickson
• Re: [WebIDL] Simplify callbacks Jonas Sicking
• Re: [WebIDL] Simplify callbacks Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [WebIDL] Remove string constants Dominique Hazael-Massieux
• [Bug 14877] Define [[Class]] of interface prototype objects, exception interface objects, and exception interface prototype objects bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: [WebIDL] Remove string constants Cameron McCormack
• [Bug 14813] Prototype of interface objects is Object.prototype in implementations, not Function.prototype bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: [WebIDL] Simplify callbacks Ian Hickson
• [Bug 14913] No way to specify [OverrideBuiltins] if the getter is in a partial interface bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 14885] "4.9.1.1. Exception interface object [[Call]] method" does not match browsers bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: [WebIDL] Simplify callbacks Cameron McCormack
• Re: [WebIDL] Simplify callbacks Cameron McCormack
• Re: [WebIDL] Simplify callbacks Ian Hickson

Wednesday, 14 December 2011

• [Bug 11451] Add a string enum type bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 11451] Add a string enum type bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 11451] Add a string enum type bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: Distinguishing objects and arrays? Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [WebIDL] Simplify callbacks Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Grammar for extended attributes & typedef Dominique Hazael-Massieux
• [Bug 14188] Union types bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: [WebIDL] Remove string constants Dominique Hazael-Massieux
• Re: [Bug 14188] Union types Simon Pieters
• [Bug 14188] Union types bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: Distinguishing objects and arrays? Cameron McCormack
• Re: [WebIDL] Behavior for negative values passed for unsigned arguments Jonas Sicking
• Re: [WebIDL] Behavior for negative values passed for unsigned arguments Cameron McCormack
• Re: [WebIDL] Simplify callbacks Cameron McCormack
• Re: [WebIDL] Simplify callbacks Cameron McCormack
• Re: [WebIDL] Remove string constants Cameron McCormack

Tuesday, 13 December 2011

• Re: Grammar for extended attributes & typedef Cameron McCormack
• Grammar for extended attributes & typedef Dominique Hazael-Massieux
• Re: [WebIDL] Remove string constants Dominique Hazael-Massieux
• [Bug 14428] Investigate if onfoo properties should be handled in a special way in interface.prototype bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 14746] Clarify what happens when you try using unsupported property indexes bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

Monday, 12 December 2011

• RE: Web IDL: LC2 feedback Travis Leithead
• Re: Web IDL Java language binding split out Alex Russell
• Re: Modules (27 September 2011 Last Call Working Draft) Marcos Caceres
• Re: [WebIDL] Remove string constants Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Web IDL: LC2 feedback Cameron McCormack
• Web IDL Java language binding split out Cameron McCormack
• Re: [WebIDL] Remove string constants Cameron McCormack
• Re: Modules (27 September 2011 Last Call Working Draft) Cameron McCormack

Saturday, 10 December 2011

• [Bug 11451] Add a string enum type bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 14843] Range interface uses enum, which doesn't exist in WebIDL bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

Friday, 9 December 2011

• [Bug 11451] Add a string enum type bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 11451] Add a string enum type bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 12810] Consider adding an integer enumeration type bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 12810] Consider adding an integer enumeration type bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: [WebIDL] Make [AllowAny] the default? Anne van Kesteren
• Re: overload resolution consistency Simon Pieters
• [Bug 14843] Range interface uses enum, which doesn't exist in WebIDL bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 11451] Add a string enum type bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: [WebIDL] Remove string constants Anne van Kesteren
• Re: TypeError and use of bold Marcos Caceres
• [Bug 12810] Consider adding an integer enumeration type bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 12810] Consider adding an integer enumeration type bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 14843] Range interface uses enum, which doesn't exist in WebIDL bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 14885] "4.9.1.1. Exception interface object [[Call]] method" does not match browsers bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 14913] No way to specify [OverrideBuiltins] if the getter is in a partial interface bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 14843] Range interface uses enum, which doesn't exist in WebIDL bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 14877] Define [[Class]] of interface prototype objects, exception interface objects, and exception interface prototype objects bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 14887] Prototype of exception interface objects is Object.prototype in implementations, not Error.prototype bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 14813] Prototype of interface objects is Object.prototype in implementations, not Function.prototype bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 14888] The statement about converting IDL nullable type to ECMAScript value is stated reversely. bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: TypeError and use of bold Cameron McCormack
• Re: Dictionaries in WebIDL Cameron McCormack
• Re: Lazy interface objects? Cameron McCormack
• Re: [WebIDL] Remove string constants Cameron McCormack
• Re: overload resolution consistency Cameron McCormack
• Re: [WebIDL] Make [AllowAny] the default? Cameron McCormack
• Re: [WebIDL] Make [AllowAny] the default? Brendan Eich
• Re: [WebIDL] Make [AllowAny] the default? Cameron McCormack
• [Bug 11451] Add a string enum type bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

Wednesday, 7 December 2011

• [Bug 14878] Rename const to legacyconst bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

Tuesday, 6 December 2011

• [Bug 11451] Add a string enum type bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: [WebIDL] Make [AllowAny] the default? Anne van Kesteren
• [Bug 14878] Rename const to legacyconst bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 11451] Add a string enum type bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 11451] Add a string enum type bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: overload resolution consistency Simon Pieters
• [Bug 10623] Simplify Web IDL exceptions bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 14878] Rename const to legacyconst bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 11451] Add a string enum type bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: [WebIDL] Make [AllowAny] the default? Cameron McCormack
• Re: All ECMAScript attributes should be non-configurable Cameron McCormack
• overload resolution consistency Cameron McCormack

Monday, 5 December 2011

• Re: Type restriction of elements in Array Cameron McCormack
• [Bug 14188] Union types bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 14188] Union types bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

Thursday, 1 December 2011

• [Bug 14877] Define [[Class]] of interface prototype objects, exception interface objects, and exception interface prototype objects bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 14843] Range interface uses enum, which doesn't exist in WebIDL bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

Friday, 25 November 2011

• [Bug 14877] Define [[Class]] of interface prototype objects, exception interface objects, and exception interface prototype objects bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 14878] Rename const to legacyconst bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 14877] Define [[Class]] of interface prototype objects, exception interface objects, and exception interface prototype objects bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

Thursday, 24 November 2011

• [Bug 14188] Union types bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 11451] Add a string enum type bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 14843] Range interface uses enum, which doesn't exist in WebIDL bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

Wednesday, 23 November 2011

• [Bug 14878] Rename const to legacyconst bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 14878] Rename const to legacyconst bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 14916] WebIDL has no function type bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 14916] WebIDL has no function type bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 14916] New: WebIDL has no function type bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 14913] No way to specify [OverrideBuiltins] if the getter is in a partial interface bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 14877] Define [[Class]] of interface prototype objects, exception interface objects, and exception interface prototype objects bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 14877] Define [[Class]] of interface prototype objects, exception interface objects, and exception interface prototype objects bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 14913] New: No way to specify [OverrideBuiltins] if the getter is in a partial interface bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 14878] Rename const to legacyconst bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 14877] Define [[Class]] of interface prototype objects, exception interface objects, and exception interface prototype objects bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: Reviving E4X (H4E)? ☻Mike Samuel

Tuesday, 22 November 2011

• Re: Reviving E4X (H4E)? Mark S. Miller
• Re: Reviving E4X (H4E)? ☻Mike Samuel
• Re: Reviving E4X (H4E)? Alex Russell
• [Bug 14878] Rename const to legacyconst bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 14878] Rename const to legacyconst bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 14878] Rename const to legacyconst bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 14878] Rename const to legacyconst bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 14878] Rename const to legacyconst bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 14877] Define [[Class]] of interface prototype objects, exception interface objects, and exception interface prototype objects bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 14878] Rename const to legacyconst bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

Monday, 21 November 2011

• [Bug 14877] Define [[Class]] of interface prototype objects, exception interface objects, and exception interface prototype objects bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 14877] Define [[Class]] of interface prototype objects, exception interface objects, and exception interface prototype objects bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 14878] Rename const to legacyconst bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 14878] Rename const to legacyconst bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 14885] "4.9.1.1. Exception interface object [[Call]] method" does not match browsers bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 14813] Prototype of interface objects is Object.prototype in implementations, not Function.prototype bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 14878] Rename const to legacyconst bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 14877] Define [[Class]] of interface prototype objects, exception interface objects, and exception interface prototype objects bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 14887] Prototype of exception interface objects is Object.prototype in implementations, not Error.prototype bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 14885] "4.9.1.1. Exception interface object [[Call]] method" does not match browsers bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 14878] Rename const to legacyconst bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 14878] Rename const to legacyconst bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 14877] Define [[Class]] of interface prototype objects, exception interface objects, and exception interface prototype objects bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 14885] "4.9.1.1. Exception interface object [[Call]] method" does not match browsers bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 14813] Prototype of interface objects is Object.prototype in implementations, not Function.prototype bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 14887] Prototype of exception interface objects is Object.prototype in implementations, not Error.prototype bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 14878] Rename const to legacyconst bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: Function type Anne van Kesteren
• [Bug 14878] Rename const to legacyconst bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 14877] Define [[Class]] of interface prototype objects, exception interface objects, and exception interface prototype objects bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

Sunday, 20 November 2011

• [Bug 14888] The statement about converting IDL nullable type to ECMAScript value is stated reversely. bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 14888] New: The statement about converting IDL nullable type to ECMAScript value is stated reversely. bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 14887] New: Prototype of exception interface objects is Object.prototype in implementations, not Error.prototype bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 14813] Prototype of interface objects is Object.prototype in implementations, not Function.prototype bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 14877] Define [[Class]] of interface prototype objects, exception interface objects, and exception interface prototype objects bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 14885] New: "4.9.1.1. Exception interface object [[Call]] method" does not match browsers bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 14877] Define [[Class]] of interface prototype objects bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

Saturday, 19 November 2011

• [Bug 14878] Rename const to legacyconst bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 14877] Define [[Class]] of interface prototype objects bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

Friday, 18 November 2011

• [Bug 14877] Define [[Class]] of interface prototype objects bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 14877] Define [[Class]] of interface prototype objects bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 14877] Define [[Class]] of interface prototype objects bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 14877] Define [[Class]] of interface prototype objects bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 14878] New: Rename const to legacyconst bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 14877] New: Define [[Class]] of interface prototype objects bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Function type Marcos Caceres
• Re: WebIDL Test generator for testharness.js Aryeh Gregor
• [Bug 14843] Range interface uses enum, which doesn't exist in WebIDL bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

Thursday, 17 November 2011

• Re: WebIDL Test generator for testharness.js James Graham
• [Bug 14843] Range interface uses enum, which doesn't exist in WebIDL bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• WebIDL Test generator for testharness.js Dominique Hazael-Massieux

Wednesday, 16 November 2011

• [Bug 14843] Range interface uses enum, which doesn't exist in WebIDL bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 14843] Range interface uses enum, which doesn't exist in WebIDL bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 14843] Range interface uses enum, which doesn't exist in WebIDL bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• TypeError and use of bold Marcos Caceres

Tuesday, 15 November 2011

• RE: What type should .findAll return Travis Leithead
• Re: What type should .findAll return Allen Wirfs-Brock
• Re: What type should .findAll return Yehuda Katz

Monday, 14 November 2011

• Re: What type should .findAll return Brendan Eich
• Re: What type should .findAll return Yehuda Katz
• Re: What type should .findAll return Brendan Eich
• Re: What type should .findAll return Yehuda Katz
• Re: [WebIDL] Simplify callbacks Anne van Kesteren
• Re: What type should .findAll return Rick Waldron
• [Bug 14813] Prototype of interface objects is Object.prototype in implementations, not Function.prototype bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: What type should .findAll return Jonas Sicking
• Re: What type should .findAll return Allen Wirfs-Brock

Sunday, 13 November 2011

• [Bug 14813] Prototype of interface objects is Object.prototype in implementations, not Function.prototype bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 14813] Prototype of interface objects is Object.prototype in implementations, not Function.prototype bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 14813] Prototype of interface objects is Object.prototype in implementations, not Function.prototype bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 14813] New: Prototype of interface objects is Object.prototype in implementations, not Function.prototype bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: What type should .findAll return Boris Zbarsky

Saturday, 12 November 2011

• Re: What type should .findAll return Yehuda Katz
• Re: What type should .findAll return Allen Wirfs-Brock
• Re: What type should .findAll return Boris Zbarsky
• Re: What type should .findAll return Boris Zbarsky
• Re: What type should .findAll return Allen Wirfs-Brock
• Re: What type should .findAll return Boris Zbarsky
• Re: What type should .findAll return Yehuda Katz
• Re: What type should .findAll return Jonas Sicking
• Re: What type should .findAll return Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: What type should .findAll return Rick Waldron
• Re: What type should .findAll return Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: What type should .findAll return Rick Waldron
• Re: What type should .findAll return Allen Wirfs-Brock

Friday, 11 November 2011

• Re: What type should .findAll return Brendan Eich
• Re: What type should .findAll return Jonas Sicking
• Re: What type should .findAll return Allen Wirfs-Brock
• Re: What type should .findAll return Jonas Sicking
• Re: What type should .findAll return Allen Wirfs-Brock
• Re: What type should .findAll return Allen Wirfs-Brock
• Re: What type should .findAll return Brendan Eich
• Re: What type should .findAll return Boris Zbarsky
• Re: What type should .findAll return Jonas Sicking
• Re: What type should .findAll return Brendan Eich
• Re: What type should .findAll return Jake Verbaten
• Re: What type should .findAll return Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: What type should .findAll return Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: What type should .findAll return Jake Verbaten
• What type should .findAll return Jonas Sicking

Thursday, 10 November 2011

• [Bug 14428] Investigate if onfoo properties should be handled in a special way in interface.prototype bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: [WebIDL] Simplify callbacks Brendan Eich
• Re: [WebIDL] Simplify callbacks David Flanagan
• Re: [WebIDL] Simplify callbacks Jonas Sicking
• Re: [NoInterfaceObject] Robin Berjon
• Re: [WebIDL] Simplify callbacks Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [WebIDL] Simplify callbacks Robin Berjon
• Re: [WebIDL] Simplify callbacks Jonas Sicking
• Re: [WebIDL] Simplify callbacks Cameron McCormack

Wednesday, 9 November 2011

• [Bug 14746] New: Clarify what happens when you try using unsupported property indexes bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: [WebIDL] Simplify callbacks Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [WebIDL] Simplify callbacks David Flanagan
• Re: [WebIDL] Simplify callbacks Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [WebIDL] Simplify callbacks Robin Berjon
• Re: [WebIDL] Simplify callbacks Robin Berjon
• Re: [WebIDL] Simplify callbacks Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [WebIDL] Simplify callbacks Anne van Kesteren

Tuesday, 8 November 2011

• Re: [WebIDL] Simplify callbacks David Flanagan
• Re: [WebIDL] Simplify callbacks Olli Pettay
• Re: [WebIDL] Simplify callbacks Brendan Eich
• Re: [WebIDL] Simplify callbacks Olli Pettay
• Re: [WebIDL] Simplify callbacks David Flanagan
• Re: [WebIDL] Simplify callbacks Olli Pettay
• Re: [WebIDL] Simplify callbacks Olli Pettay
• Re: [WebIDL] Simplify callbacks David Flanagan
• Re: [WebIDL] Simplify callbacks Dominic Cooney
• Re: [WebIDL] Simplify callbacks Ojan Vafai
• Re: [WebIDL] Simplify callbacks Dominic Cooney
• RE: [WebIDL] Simplify callbacks Travis Leithead
• Re: [WebIDL] Simplify callbacks Ojan Vafai
• [WebIDL] Simplify callbacks Anne van Kesteren

Sunday, 30 October 2011

• Re: [WebIDL] Dictionaries and undefined Cameron McCormack

Wednesday, 26 October 2011

• Re: [WebIDL] Proposing changes to overload resolution behavior Kyle Huey

Tuesday, 25 October 2011

• Re: E4H Erik Arvidsson
• Re: E4H Alex Russell
• Re: E4H Brendan Eich
• Re: E4H Olli Pettay
• Re: E4H David Bruant
• Re: E4H David Bruant
• E4H Anne van Kesteren

Monday, 24 October 2011

• Re: [WebIDL] Proposing changes to overload resolution behavior Cameron McCormack
• RE: Modules (27 September 2011 Last Call Working Draft) Travis Leithead
• Re: [WebIDL] Proposing changes to overload resolution behavior Kyle Huey
• Re: [WebIDL] Proposing changes to overload resolution behavior Cameron McCormack
• Re: Reminder: RfC: Last Call Working Draft of Web IDL; deadline October 18 Cameron McCormack

Sunday, 23 October 2011

• Re: Reviving E4X (H4E)? Dominic Cooney

Saturday, 22 October 2011

• Modules (27 September 2011 Last Call Working Draft) Marcos Caceres
• Re: [WebIDL] Make [AllowAny] the default? Anne van Kesteren

Friday, 21 October 2011

• RE: [WebIDL] Make [AllowAny] the default? Travis Leithead
• widlproc moved to github Dominique Hazael-Massieux
• [WebIDL] Make [AllowAny] the default? Anne van Kesteren

Thursday, 20 October 2011

• [Bug 10623] Simplify Web IDL exceptions bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: [WebIDL] Remove string constants Ian Hickson
• Re: [WebIDL] Remove string constants James Graham
• Re: [WebIDL] Remove string constants Jonas Sicking

Wednesday, 19 October 2011

• Re: Reviving E4X (H4E)? ☻Mike Samuel
• Re: Reviving E4X (H4E)? ☻Mike Samuel
• Re: Reviving E4X (H4E)? ☻Mike Samuel

Thursday, 20 October 2011

• Re: Reviving E4X (H4E)? Alex Russell
• Re: [WebIDL] Remove string constants James Graham
• Re: [WebIDL] Remove string constants Jonas Sicking
• Re: [WebIDL] Remove string constants Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [WebIDL] Remove string constants Jonas Sicking
• Re: Reviving E4X (H4E)? Anne van Kesteren
• [WebIDL] Remove string constants Anne van Kesteren

Wednesday, 19 October 2011

• Re: Reviving E4X (H4E)? Allen Wirfs-Brock
• Re: Reviving E4X (H4E)? Brendan Eich
• Re: Reviving E4X (H4E)? Allen Wirfs-Brock
• Re: Reviving E4X (H4E)? Brendan Eich
• Re: Reviving E4X (H4E)? Mark S. Miller
• Re: Reviving E4X (H4E)? Alex Russell
• Reviving E4X (H4E)? Anne van Kesteren
• [Bug 10623] Simplify Web IDL exceptions bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Web IDL: LC2 feedback Travis Leithead

Tuesday, 18 October 2011

• Re: Type restriction of elements in Array Garrett Smith

Monday, 17 October 2011

• Re: Type restriction of elements in Array Erik Arvidsson
• Re: Type restriction of elements in Array Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Type restriction of elements in Array Alex Russell

Thursday, 13 October 2011

• [Bug 10623] Simplify Web IDL exceptions bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 10623] Simplify Web IDL exceptions bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 10623] Simplify Web IDL exceptions bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

Wednesday, 12 October 2011

• [Bug 14428] Investigate if onfoo properties should be handled in a special way in interface.prototype bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

Tuesday, 11 October 2011

• Re: Reminder: RfC: Last Call Working Draft of Web IDL; deadline October 18 Arthur Barstow
• Re: [WebIDL] Dictionaries and undefined Jonas Sicking
• RE: Reminder: RfC: Last Call Working Draft of Web IDL; deadline October 18 Travis Leithead
• Re: All ECMAScript attributes should be non-configurable Erik Arvidsson
• Re: All ECMAScript attributes should be non-configurable Mark S. Miller
• Re: [WebIDL] Dictionaries and undefined Brendan Eich
• Re: [WebIDL] Dictionaries and undefined Erik Arvidsson
• Re: All ECMAScript attributes should be non-configurable Erik Arvidsson
• [Bug 14428] Investigate if onfoo properties should be handled in a special way in interface.prototype bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 14428] Investigate if onfoo properties should be handled in a special way in interface.prototype bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: All ECMAScript attributes should be non-configurable Mark S. Miller
• Re: [WebIDL] Dictionaries and undefined Mark S. Miller
• [Bug 14428] New: Investigate if onfoo properties should be handled in a special way in interface.prototype bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Reminder: RfC: Last Call Working Draft of Web IDL; deadline October 18 Arthur Barstow
• Re: All ECMAScript attributes should be non-configurable David Bruant
• Re: [WebIDL] Dictionaries and undefined Dominic Cooney
• Type restriction of elements in Array Kisub Song
• [WebIDL] Dictionaries and undefined Jonas Sicking

Monday, 10 October 2011

• [WebIDL] Proposing changes to overload resolution behavior Kyle Huey

Friday, 7 October 2011

• Dictionaries in WebIDL Ross Burton

Wednesday, 5 October 2011

• Re: [NoInterfaceObject] Robin Berjon

Saturday, 1 October 2011

• [Bug 13499] Introduce "assume-null-if-not-object" flag bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 13499] Introduce "assume-null-if-not-object" flag bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

Last message date: Thursday, 29 December 2011 16:22:17 UTC