Re: [[Call]] behaviour of operations

On 09/09/11 12:25, Cameron McCormack wrote:
> On 29/08/11 9:08 PM, Geoffrey Sneddon wrote:
>> Right, so to be consistent with ES built-ins, my suggestion would be
>> simply to add a step 0 to the first list in #es-operations saying:
>> "If the interface on which the operation appears has an [ImplicitThis]
>> extended attribute, and the this value is null or undefined, then let O
>> be the ECMAScript global object associated with the Function object."
>> And change step 1 to start with "Otherwise,".
> I've made this change (or thereabouts).

For the sake of the disposition of comments: I'm happy with that change, 
provided a similar change is made for attribute getters and setters.

Geoffrey Sneddon — Opera Software

Received on Monday, 12 September 2011 06:30:50 UTC