Re: Double-to-integer conversion behavior and options

On 9/9/11 1:33 AM, Cameron McCormack wrote:
>
> I've made these changes.
>
> http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2006/webapi/WebIDL/Overview.html.diff?r1=1.393;r2=1.394;f=h 
>
>
> Boris and David (since your earlier comment "ยง4.2.9: conversion to 
> unsigned long and bounds checking" is similar) please let me know if 
> the change is satisfactory.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Cameron
Cameron,

The [EnforceRange] attribute addresses my concern exactly.  Thanks!

     David

Received on Friday, 9 September 2011 16:37:54 UTC