- From: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
- Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2011 23:28:43 +1000
- To: "public-script-coord@w3.org" <public-script-coord@w3.org>
Hello everyone. I've just finished resolving the LC comments on Web IDL. The only sticking point is the one about modules -- I decided to defer their removal just because I don't have the time right now, but it seems like that is the right thing to do. I think it should be OK to drop them from the spec after the publication, and not have that be an impediment to going to CR afterwards. Similarly, there was some editorial work (making more obvious which features are for legacy APIs only) that I did not get to. I will do that once I am back, too. There were a couple of questions in Allen Wirfs-Brock's feedback that weren't direct requests for changes, but my response questions to him might result in some further changes at some point. Nothing drastic, though. The lc1.txt file is up to date, I believe. We probably don't need to wait for commenter satisfaction indication in all cases, since we are not going to CR straight away. I'm away for the next four week, so it would be good if we could get the spec published again. Art, if you think we are good to go, could you do a CfC for LCWD#2 (and assume my +1 to publishing) and handle the publication? Thanks, Cameron
Received on Friday, 9 September 2011 13:29:22 UTC