- From: Travis Leithead <Travis.Leithead@microsoft.com>
- Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2011 16:20:26 +0000
- To: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
- CC: "public-script-coord@w3.org" <public-script-coord@w3.org>, "ian@hixie.ch" <ian@hixie.ch>, "Jonas Sicking (jonas@sicking.cc)" <jonas@sicking.cc>, "simonp@opera.com" <simonp@opera.com>
>From: Cameron McCormack [mailto:cam@mcc.id.au], Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2011 3:53 AM >On 8/09/11 9:42 AM, Travis Leithead wrote: >> This appears to be one of the only cases for [CopyInheritedPrototype] in >WebIDL, and if we don't want/need this to be available anywhere else, I'd >prefer not to have to support it. > >Indeed. I've removed [CopyInheritedPrototype] now. > >Travis, I'm interpreting this as an "accept" resolution to your comment >LC-34 (request for [CopyInheritedPrototype] use cases). > >Ian, I'm interpreting your original mail in this thread as a request to >add support for the use case that [CopyInheritedPrototype] would've >solved, which this is a rejection of. > >If both of you could indicate whether this is response is satisfactory, >that would be appreciated. This is acceptable resolution to my comment. >Thanks, > >Cameron
Received on Thursday, 8 September 2011 16:21:01 UTC