Re: Removing 'caller' from WebIDL

• From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
• Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 09:32:03 -0400
• To: public-script-coord@w3.org
• Message-ID: <4E5CE653.2080207@mit.edu>

On 8/30/11 3:03 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Aug 2011 06:08:59 +0200, Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
> wrote:
>> I'm open to removing "caller" from Web IDL if people think that's
>> best, and I'd be happy to suggest wording to be added to the HTML spec
>> to handle the cases that do need to remain.
>
> I think we should keep it in IDL because it needs to be implemented

Where does it need to be implemented other than document.all?

If it only needs to be implemented in one place, why does it need to be 
a general IDL-based mechanism?

-Boris

Received on Tuesday, 30 August 2011 13:32:42 UTC