Re: [WebIDL] Handling undefined in Overload Resolution Algorithm from Cameron McCormack on 2011-08-23 (public-script-coord@w3.org from July to September 2011)

From: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2011 22:35:14 +1200
To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
CC: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>, Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>, public-script-coord@w3.org, bzbarsky@mit.edu, allen@wirfs-brock.com
Message-ID: <4E538262.7030903@mcc.id.au>

On 23/08/11 10:27 PM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> FWIW, today I changed XMLHttpRequest's open() from being overloaded to
> simply having optional arguments. I hope they are considered identical.

I doubt I'll be removing that equivalence, so that should be fine.

Received on Tuesday, 23 August 2011 10:36:08 UTC