- From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2011 01:43:30 +0200
- To: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
- Cc: public-script-coord@w3.org
* Cameron McCormack wrote: >Thanks for all the discussion in the thread. It sounds like the >following is what was settled on: > >* When undefined is passed, it is always treated the same as if it was > not passed at all. Briefly scanning through the specification, this is not true of all sorts of functions, Array.prototype.reduce/Right, the String, Number, and Date constructors, every other Date method, and more. Now, that is not "overload resolution" as ECMAScript does not support that, but the notion above seems rather inconsistent with what you can expect when using the language. -- Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de Am Badedeich 7 · Telefon: +49(0)160/4415681 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de 25899 Dagebüll · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/
Received on Monday, 8 August 2011 23:44:01 UTC