Re: May the defineProperty method of a proxy handler throw a TypeError? from Mark S. Miller on 2011-08-08 (public-script-coord@w3.org from July to September 2011)

From: Mark S. Miller <erights@google.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2011 14:40:37 -0700
To: David Flanagan <dflanagan@mozilla.com>
Cc: Tom Van Cutsem <tomvc.be@gmail.com>, Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>, "public-script-coord@w3.org" <public-script-coord@w3.org>, es-discuss <es-discuss@mozilla.org>
Message-ID: <CABHxS9jXc6Mxwx4R=FVsi1kxxpe_qEX5kFvwNen=tFDEtAC_Hg@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 2:20 PM, David Flanagan <dflanagan@mozilla.com>wrote:
[...]

> Since WebIDL is in last-call status, this is probably a good time to decide
> whether the proxy proposal should change to allow faithful emulation of
> Reject, or whether WebIDL should change to throw a TypeError instead of
> using Reject...


If there are no show-stopping legacy compat constraints forcing us to
specify Reject, I prefer that we specify these to throw a TypeError.


-- 
    Cheers,
    --MarkM

Received on Monday, 8 August 2011 21:41:21 UTC