On 8/4/11 4:44 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > On Thu, 04 Aug 2011 02:50:38 +0200, Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au> > wrote: >> Let me know your thoughts. > > In general this sounds good to me. Has anyone tested legacy APIs like > the open() method of XMLHttpRequest to see if you get the same? I sort > of thought undefined was passed through, but maybe I misremember. In Gecko, undefined used to be treated as "not specified" for XMLHttpRequest. When we changed to following the current spec (which converts undefined to "undefined") we actually ran into compat issues with some popular JS libraries that pass undefined for username/password explicitly. For now we're sticking it out, but it sure would be nice to not have those compat issues! -BorisReceived on Thursday, 4 August 2011 14:10:35 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:04 UTC