- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2011 04:19:59 +0000
- To: public-script-coord@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12248 --- Comment #22 from Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> 2011-03-08 04:19:59 UTC --- Just to be clear, I have no opinion on what we should do here or in bug 12101, so long as what we define is interoperably implementable and secure. The only situation I want to avoid is one in which today we allow a variety of different implementations, and a few years down the line we find that only one is viable on the Web due to market forces, and now we're forced to implement (and specify) the particular option that the market thus forced on us. If we can make this work with getters then so much the better. I have no problem with comment 14's (A), my problem is just that I don't know how to specify that such that it is interoperably implementable. This is a practical problem the simplest solution for which is just for someone to tell me what to write, not a philosophical one and not a disagreement on my part. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 8 March 2011 04:20:01 UTC