- From: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
- Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 23:11:52 +1200
- To: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
- Cc: public-script-coord <public-script-coord@w3.org>
Arthur Barstow: > Assuming there is consensus to publish this LCWD, a couple of > administrative details: > > 1. Length of the LC review: given the relatively broad interest, I > would recommend 6 weeks minimum. WDYT? Yes I think that’s fine. > 2. W3C Groups to review: at least the following WGs: WebApps, HTML, > SVG, Web Performance, Web Notifications, DAP, Web Events, > Geolocation. Are there any other groups? The CSS Working Group has at least CSSOM, which uses Web IDL. I can’t think of any others. > 3. TC39: after the LC is published (and July 12 would be earliest > date), perhaps you or PLH should notify them of the publication Yes, one of us can email es-discuss, although a few TC39 members are on public-script-coord so I am sure they will be aware. -- Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/
Received on Thursday, 30 June 2011 11:19:34 UTC