- From: Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>
- Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 10:43:19 +0200
- To: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
- Cc: public-script-coord@w3.org
On Jun 27, 2011, at 05:06 , Cameron McCormack wrote: > Although I thought [Callback=FunctionOnly] would only be used for cases > where compatibility required the different handling from the default, > some spec authors seem to have taken a liking to it. I'm pretty sure that there's an awful lot of cut and paste going on, I wouldn't necessarily read all that much into it. It takes way too much IDL to specify a callback, and most of what's required is boilerplate. People just copy from other specs and it takes a while before someone notices this. We should probably try to make editors more aware of this. -- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon
Received on Monday, 27 June 2011 08:44:01 UTC