- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 03:48:33 +0000
- To: public-script-coord@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12458 --- Comment #11 from Mark S. Miller <erights@gmail.com> 2011-05-23 03:48:32 UTC --- (In reply to comment #10) > Another point is that interface objects also have to respond to [[HasInstance]] > (so that you can do `document instanceof Node`), which for native objects is > only defined for Functions. The current Proxy proposal does not support a trap > for [[HasInstance]], http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=strawman:proxy_instanceof is a strawman that may enable that. Not accepted yet, so just FYI. > nor does it have trap that would allow an interface object > implemented as a Function object to return "object" when typeof is applied to > it. This is another issue that would prevent pure JS implementations of the > DOM, which some people want to do. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Monday, 23 May 2011 03:48:34 UTC