- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 09 May 2011 03:07:00 +0000
- To: public-script-coord@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12635
Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Depends on| |12320
--- Comment #5 from Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au> 2011-05-09 03:06:59 UTC ---
I've added back the check (which I am sure used to be in there) for calling
Functions that correspond to IDL operations so that it throws a TypeError if
the 'this' object is not an object that implements the relevant interface.
(This check was already present for most of the other Function cases, like
getter/setter Functions.) Whether an object "implements" a given interface is
still kinda hand-wavey, but the intention is to throw for cases like comment 4.
I'll try to come up with a rigorous definition of "implements" as part of bug
12320.
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Monday, 9 May 2011 03:07:02 UTC