- From: Mark S. Miller <erights@google.com>
- Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2010 07:44:05 -0800
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Cc: "public-script-coord@w3.org" <public-script-coord@w3.org>
Received on Friday, 19 February 2010 15:44:39 UTC
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 7:42 AM, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com> wrote: > On Fri, 19 Feb 2010 16:25:44 +0100, Mark S. Miller <erights@google.com> > wrote: > >> This is yet another example of why WebIDL is a bad language for designing >> JavaScript APIs. The choices encouraged by WebIDL, and that seem natural >> in WebIDL, often result in bad JavaScript API designs. >> > > I'm not sure what you mean. We're not starting to reason based on Web IDL. > We're simply trying to extend a legacy API and I'm wondering how to express > that in Web IDL. How do you propose your new DOMString-like object be represented in JavaScript? > > > -- > Anne van Kesteren > http://annevankesteren.nl/ > -- Cheers, --MarkM
Received on Friday, 19 February 2010 15:44:39 UTC