- From: Chris Marrin <cmarrin@apple.com>
- Date: Fri, 14 May 2010 07:17:52 -0700
- To: Erik Arvidsson <erik.arvidsson@gmail.com>
- Cc: arun@mozilla.com, public-script-coord@w3.org, es-discuss@mozilla.org
On May 13, 2010, at 4:57 PM, Erik Arvidsson wrote: > I'm surprised no one has said this yet but here goes: > > ArrayBuffer needs to extend Array. In other words instances of > ArrayBuffer needs to also be instances of Array I don't believe ArrayBuffer behaves like a superset of Array at all. It is intended to be an opaque type whose data is not accessible except via "views" into a range of the buffer (possibly the entire buffer). But I can understand your concern about the naming, which can of course be changed.
Received on Friday, 14 May 2010 14:18:57 UTC