- From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 17:58:56 +0100
- To: Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>
- Cc: Gareth Oakes <goakes@gpsl.co>, Peter Murray-Rust <pm286@cam.ac.uk>, W3C Scholarly HTML CG <public-scholarlyhtml@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <2960CC77-A55E-4F5D-9999-65F2B6A5518C@w3.org>
> On 18 Mar 2016, at 17:45, Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com> wrote: > > On 18/03/2016 12:36 , Ivan Herman wrote: >>> On 18 Mar 2016, at 17:10, Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com> wrote: A >>> first step for this would be to use the HTML validator. It's not >>> constraining enough, but it would certainly already catch issues. >>> The only problem with that is that it only supports RDFa Lite, >>> whereas SH uses a little bit of RDFa Full. Ideally, I'd like to get >>> rid of that and rely only on Lite — input on achieving this >>> welcome. >> >> @darobin, can you point out which are the features that are not RDFa >> Lite? I am happy to look at it (though I cannot promise that >> something can be found) > > There is at least one case in which we use @about (for roleAffiliation). > I think we could probably use @resource instead. I believe so. > > When more information is available than ought to be *shown* (but it > still should be shared), we recommend meta@content. We could use spans > with CSS display: none but that's a bit dodgy, or we could have JSON-LD > islands (but that gets verbose and increasingly weird). I believe RDFa Lite works with meta and @content. My distiller definitely accepts it… But looking at the RDFa Lite spec it indeed does not list @content. Ouch…:-) > > We also use @datatype to mark how precise dates are (it is common to > only have a year). I guess that could be skipped since it's easily > inferred from content. But we also use it to mark content as rdf:HTML — > removing that capability would be more problematic. > yes, datatype is definitely out. > Actually, writing all this down I think it would be simpler to fix the > HTML validator :) > If there is a need to fix it, which is the @content issue. The problem is to get it through Mike, who would do anything to kill RDFa in the first place, and not help it… Ivan > -- > • Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon > • http://science.ai/ — intelligent science publishing > • ---- Ivan Herman, W3C Digital Publishing Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ mobile: +31-641044153 ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704
Received on Friday, 18 March 2016 16:59:12 UTC