Hi Ivan, >> But I seem to be the only one worrying about that, so I don't mind >> backing away from it if it means we can make progress on the rest. > > No, you are not the only one worrying about that. I think it is perfectly fine to require that an SH would be in Unicode, and probably UTF-8 is the right way to go due to its widespread use. Yes, please! I don’t really care about HTML syntax vs. XHTML syntax compared with the encoding issue… The use of a mandatory encoding like UTF-8 is a very good requirement for having the minimum amount of troubles when processing SH documents – a.k.a., handling different encodings is a real nightmare. Brrr… Have a nice day :-) S. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Silvio Peroni, Ph.D. Department of Computer Science and Engineering University of Bologna, Bologna (Italy) Tel: +39 051 2094871 E-mail: silvio.peroni@unibo.it Web: http://www.essepuntato.it Twitter: essepuntato
Received on Friday, 4 December 2015 16:47:28 UTC