Re: [schemaorg/schemaorg] Medical/health vocabulary as an extension (#492)

Hi There,
I am happy that things are moving forward. I have been absent for a while
for several reason but now I think I can again follow this effort outcome.
@twamarc: Where are you with clinicaltrial.gov? Any update with
collaboration with ICD11?

I was catching up with the discussions about the medicalspeciality and
subs. I think we do not need to import the Wiki listing in our vocab. Can't
we just look for a mechanism of pointing to their URI outside the
extension? Otherwise I don't think we can add more than 100 types without a
real demand (API or a public domain).
What do you think chair?

Regards
Happy to join again.
James


On 10 August 2016 at 16:27, Dan Brickley <notifications@github.com> wrote:

> The health-lifesci.schema.org extension was published in 3.0 and
> announced (after we fixed some bugs!) with 3.1 yesterday,
> http://blog.schema.org/2016/08/schemaorg-update-hotels-
> datasets-health.html
>
> There are various themes of discussion continuing here but all muddled
> together. I will close out this issue, and encourage all continued
> discussions to happen via more dedicated issues. Do create them if
> necessary but have a look for any pre-existing older issues first, we have
> 100s open and it's important to keep our open issue count under country.
>
> Thanks again to everyone who contributed to the health-lifesci milestone -
> it was one of the largest structural changes we've made to how the schemas
> here are organized.
>
> —
> You are receiving this because you commented.
> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
> <https://github.com/schemaorg/schemaorg/issues/492#issuecomment-238883519>,
> or mute the thread
> <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ANfPNPE2jN42s69VBX1d0l4p2GG6q6y8ks5qed-5gaJpZM4EZ8rH>
> .
>