- From: Richard Wallis <richard.wallis@dataliberate.com>
- Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2021 14:43:32 -0800
- To: Michael Fienen <fienen@gmail.com>
- Cc: public-schemaorg@w3.org
Received on Tuesday, 9 November 2021 22:43:47 UTC
Adding CreativeWork <https://schema.org/CreativeWork> to the range of the transcript property <https://schema.org/transcript> wold be a good start. On 9 Nov 2021 at 22:24:11, Michael Fienen <fienen@gmail.com> wrote: > Curious if I'm just missing something on this or not, and if not, if > there's anyone interested in collaborating on improving it. What I'm > looking at is the transcript schema (https://schema.org/transcript). As > it is, it's wildly simple, just taking text. > > I currently run a podcast and produce transcript content for it, and I'm > working on how to mark it up so that it is as accessible and useful as > possible, and in the process, it seemed like there should be a clear way to > identify things like: > > - Type of transcript (machine, human, or other) > - Speakers of different parts > - Parts of the transcript (intro, body, outro) > - Language > > Along with being able to add the transcript object as a property of the > podcastEpisode schema. Is this the kind of thing that just needs someone to > champion it? > > MPF > -- Richard Wallis Founder, Data Liberate http://dataliberate.com Linkedin: http://www.linkedin.com/in/richardwallis Twitter: @dataliberate @rjw
Received on Tuesday, 9 November 2021 22:43:47 UTC